State v. Wong (1994), 95 Ohio App. 3d 39 Case Study

State v. Wong (1994), 95 Ohio App. 3d 39 - Case piece of work Exampleerdict, on the account of insanity, but these possibilities were quickly eradicated, after two psychologists declined to testify that she might non have been lucid on the day of the felony,The Appellant had sent a letter to her husband, threatening him, which illustrated the overlook of sanity from the Appellant. The drugs and alcohol influence she was under(a) in combination with the medication she had consumed could have also modify her reasoning and the claim by her daughter that she was unwell during the 911 call is an indication of the possibility that she was not sane while committing the felony.Dr. Jackson asserted that the appellant suffered from a paranoid delusional disorder and could have been under the disorders influence during the committing of the crime. The ignored these claims, returning the guilty verdict on all counts moxie into place.The court ended up sentencing her to fifteen to forty ye ars in a state penitentiary, 12 years for each count of felony done, one year on every count of vandalism and did not sentence her on the gun specification count. These sentences were to run concurrently.The lack of consent of the letter, throughout the trial was below the belt and unjust on Wongs case, but the verdict passed was a bit considerate to that passed by the reject courts. Lack of consideration of the doctors insights was also vaguely