Whistle-blowing Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Whistle-blowing - Research Paper standardAs high officials in the organization, they became privy to information that they thought would be damaging to the company. The Government obligation Project (GAP) defined a blab out blower asAn employee who discloses information that s/he middling believes is evidence of illegality, gross waste or fraud, mismanagement, abuse of power, general wrongdoing, or a substantial and peculiar(prenominal) danger to public health and safety. Typically, whistleblowers speak out to parties that can influence and rectify the situation. These parties include the media, organisational managers, hotlines, or Congressional members/staff, to name a few.These 3 women could not be properly called whistle blowers beneath the rules cited in Chap 4 of Whistle blowing,employees who follows established procedures is not a whistleblower As in definition above, whistle blowing should take into account to whom the information is given in order to achieve the sough t after change. Merely passing information to higher authorities in the organization is not whistle blowing and is simply part of their duties. Their testimony in Congress could not be called whistle blowing as they were legally indispensable to do so, and were not done voluntarily. Their memos only formed part of exhibits for testimony. Rowley could not be a whistle blower because her position requires utmost confidentiality, so she could not divulge to outer sources.Watkins advise. When Sherron Watkins wrote a lengthened memo to her boss, Ken Lay, she knew of the ticking time bomb that would explode into a scandal. She uncovered fraud that regard many persons in the organization. When she advised Ken Lay to develop a clean up visualize, she probably meant to have an organizational clean up that would correct the system, and purge erring employees. In an honest perspective, she was